<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Native XML Database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nativexmldatabase.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to list the paths of all elements in an XML document? by Matthias Nicola</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2012/02/04/how-to-list-the-paths-of-all-elements-in-an-xml-document/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Nicola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=1408#comment-1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks! I&#039;m glad this is useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;m glad this is useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to list the paths of all elements in an XML document? by Stacey Cooper</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2012/02/04/how-to-list-the-paths-of-all-elements-in-an-xml-document/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=1408#comment-1451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best solution and explanation I have found anywhere!  Perfect!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best solution and explanation I have found anywhere!  Perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advanced SQL/XML: Joins and FLWOR Expressions in the XMLTABLE Function by Matthias Nicola</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2011/10/09/advanced-sqlxml-joins-and-flwor-expressions-in-the-xmltable-function/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Nicola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=1336#comment-1444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment. I hope you find this blog useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. I hope you find this blog useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advanced SQL/XML: Joins and FLWOR Expressions in the XMLTABLE Function by haris</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2011/10/09/advanced-sqlxml-joins-and-flwor-expressions-in-the-xmltable-function/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[haris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=1336#comment-1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Thanks to write  such great example. 

Anyway I don&#039;t find any other [xml] database can perform such task except  DB2. XQuery+SQL+TEXT INDEX+Stored Proc.

I think I will explore your blog deeper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks to write  such great example. </p>
<p>Anyway I don&#8217;t find any other [xml] database can perform such task except  DB2. XQuery+SQL+TEXT INDEX+Stored Proc.</p>
<p>I think I will explore your blog deeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When to use a Native XML Database by pradeep</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2008/03/21/when-to-use-a-native-xml-database/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pradeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purexml.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i mean for data centric we use rdbms]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i mean for data centric we use rdbms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When to use a Native XML Database by pradeep</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2008/03/21/when-to-use-a-native-xml-database/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pradeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purexml.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the purpose of storing the data in XML is kinda for document centric data .... so this is the situation where we use XML ?

data centric-traditional databases like Mysql ,oracle etc etc?
document centric-XML besides db2 or oracle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the purpose of storing the data in XML is kinda for document centric data &#8230;. so this is the situation where we use XML ?</p>
<p>data centric-traditional databases like Mysql ,oracle etc etc?<br />
document centric-XML besides db2 or oracle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML versus Relational Database Performance by Matthias Nicola</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2010/08/22/xml-versus-relational-database-performance/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Nicola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=958#comment-1439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pradeep,

re Q1): Note that XML itself is not a database. XML is just a data format. Where do you store the XML? Storing the XML in a database like DB2 gives you significant benefits over storing XML in the file system, such as full support for XQuery and SQL/XML to query the XML, XML indexing for performance, XQuery Update Facility, efficient XML Schema validation, full logging and recoverability, and options for replication, high availability, data partitioning and clustering, and so on. Many of the same reason why you store relational data in a database and not in a text file.

re Q2) On example where storage data as XML is faster than normalized relational storage is when you are dealing with complex business records, such as financial trades, patient records, tax returns, and so. Storing them in a normalized relational database schema often requires dozens if not hundreds of tables. This implies that a business record needs to broken into many pieces that need to be inserted across the tables, and later these pieces need to be retrieved to reassemble the original business record. This can be complicated and slow. If each business record is represented as a single XML document, then insert and retrieval can often be much faster. 

In this context you may also find the following article interesting:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/data/library/techarticle/dm-1201normalizationpart2/index.html

Matthias]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pradeep,</p>
<p>re Q1): Note that XML itself is not a database. XML is just a data format. Where do you store the XML? Storing the XML in a database like DB2 gives you significant benefits over storing XML in the file system, such as full support for XQuery and SQL/XML to query the XML, XML indexing for performance, XQuery Update Facility, efficient XML Schema validation, full logging and recoverability, and options for replication, high availability, data partitioning and clustering, and so on. Many of the same reason why you store relational data in a database and not in a text file.</p>
<p>re Q2) On example where storage data as XML is faster than normalized relational storage is when you are dealing with complex business records, such as financial trades, patient records, tax returns, and so. Storing them in a normalized relational database schema often requires dozens if not hundreds of tables. This implies that a business record needs to broken into many pieces that need to be inserted across the tables, and later these pieces need to be retrieved to reassemble the original business record. This can be complicated and slow. If each business record is represented as a single XML document, then insert and retrieval can often be much faster. </p>
<p>In this context you may also find the following article interesting:<br />
<a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/data/library/techarticle/dm-1201normalizationpart2/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/data/library/techarticle/dm-1201normalizationpart2/index.html</a></p>
<p>Matthias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML versus Relational Database Performance by pradeep</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2010/08/22/xml-versus-relational-database-performance/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pradeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=958#comment-1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q1)When we use XML for database as a storage then what is the need of DB2 . Is DB2 is used for jus resolving the ambiguity incase for the XML ?i knew DB2 is a kind of Data processing unit for the database. 

Q2)I have been asked many times: “What is faster, XML or Relational?”. Of course, this question oversimplifies a complex issue, and so the only valid answer is “It depends!” as said by you.Could you gimme an example for this i mean for the small data is XML faster?

Do you mind that i&#039;m asking you questions many times?
because i don&#039;t have assistance or help from any1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q1)When we use XML for database as a storage then what is the need of DB2 . Is DB2 is used for jus resolving the ambiguity incase for the XML ?i knew DB2 is a kind of Data processing unit for the database. </p>
<p>Q2)I have been asked many times: “What is faster, XML or Relational?”. Of course, this question oversimplifies a complex issue, and so the only valid answer is “It depends!” as said by you.Could you gimme an example for this i mean for the small data is XML faster?</p>
<p>Do you mind that i&#8217;m asking you questions many times?<br />
because i don&#8217;t have assistance or help from any1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML versus Relational Database Performance by Matthias Nicola</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2010/08/22/xml-versus-relational-database-performance/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthias Nicola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=958#comment-1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean ambiguity between text that is XML tag name vs. the value of an XML element or attribute?  The DB2 Text Search feature for XML distinguishes between tag names and actual values, so there is no ambiguity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean ambiguity between text that is XML tag name vs. the value of an XML element or attribute?  The DB2 Text Search feature for XML distinguishes between tag names and actual values, so there is no ambiguity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML versus Relational Database Performance by pradeep</title>
		<link>http://nativexmldatabase.com/2010/08/22/xml-versus-relational-database-performance/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pradeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nativexmldatabase.com/?p=958#comment-1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Towards an effective XML keyword search is my project which is an IEEE paper 2010]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Towards an effective XML keyword search is my project which is an IEEE paper 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
